Nic of time. Not
Submitted by debritz on September 12, 2008 - 05:07.
The story was on this blog on July 26, and in other media slightly earlier, but smh.com.au has just caught up with the news that Nicole Kidman delivers the worst bang for the buck in Hollywood. It seems to be the same story based on the same Forbes study. Maybe with the release of Australia getting closer, the SMH thought it timely.
Update: Other media in Australia and the UK are running this story now, too - including The Independent, which was my source from two months ago! Bizarre.
Another case of "so much for
Another case of "so much for so little"! Since she is so crap....why does someone continually pay her large sums of money to assist films to failure at the box-office ?
I've just checked out Nicole
I've just checked out Nicole on IMDB...It's amazing ( to me ) how many movies she's 'starred' in that I've never seen.Some of them I've never even heard of.
Looking through her list,it's hard not to feel it all went pear shaped when Tom knocked on her door.Pre Cruise,she did some good and varied work.After he parked his rear end on her couch,she's basically been in rubbish.
It's a shame really,but a good lesson for all young Aussie starlets to learn...If a Hollywood Little Person gives you a call...Hang Up !!!
Post new comment